Legal Opinion

Cowart v. Honeycutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1962No. 250PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaRKee, J.

Defendant’s plea of a release is a plea in bar going to plaintiff’s entire cause of action, and if established by proof, would defeat and destroy her action altogether. McAuley v. Sloan, 173 N.C. 80, 91 S.E. 701; Bank v. Evans, 191 N.C. 535, 132 S.E. 563; Ward v. Heath, 222 N.C. 470, 24 S.E. 2d 5; Watkins v. Grier, 224 N.C. 339, 30 S.E. 2d 223; Gillikin v. Gillikin, 248 N.C. 710, 104 S.E. 2d 861.

Judge Hobgood in the exercise of his discretion had the power under the circumstances here to enter an order that the plea in bar going to plaintiff’s right to maintain her cause of action should be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Roberson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Fox v. Southern Appliances, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Anderson v. McDonaldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hyde v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API