Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
The central issue of this case is whether the defendants’ violation of the witness and exhibit listing requirements of Rule V(a), Uniform Rules of Practice of the Arizona Superior Courts, justified the trial court’s decision to preclude defendants from presenting witnesses or exhibits at trial. The remaining issues stem from the subsequent decision of defendants and their counsel to forego their presence at the trial.
Underlying this lawsuit was the disintegration of a transaction in which defendants purchased business assets belonging to plaintiff. Plaintiff filed suit on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Shell Oil Co. v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Flynn v. Cornoyer-Hedrick Architects & Planners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Broemmer v. OttoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Atr v. CecCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Baron v. HonorhealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Bibbee v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.