Legal Opinion

Broemmer v. Otto

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

This appeal involves an arbitration agreement between Melinda Broemmer and Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd. (ASP). The primary issue is whether the latter’s standardized contract is an adhesion contract meeting the reasonable expectations of the parties. We find that the arbitration agreement is enforceable and conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the lawsuit.

FACTS

After learning from an Iowa physician that she was pregnant, Broemmer decided to terminate the pregnancy. Her mother located a physician in Phoenix to perform the abortion. ASP indicated it could…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Cooper v. QC Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  5. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API