Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Cornoyer-Hedrick Architects & Planners, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 15, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9652PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The issues in this appeal are whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion to continue this case on the inactive calendar, refusing to permit a refiling of a new complaint pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-504 (Supp.1987), and signing a formal order that differed from a prior minute entry.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 17, 1985, John Flynn filed a complaint seeking damages for injuries allegedly suffered in a fall on December 17,1983, on the stairway to an office building. The complaint stated that Flynn’s injuries resulted from the negligence of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gorman v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jepson v. NewArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Maher v. UrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Mission Insurance v. Cash, Sullivan & CrossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Copeland v. Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum & Exposition CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Jepson v. NewCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API