Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Drye

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1960No. 240PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the failure of the court to explain to the jury the provisions of the reckless driving statute, G.S. 20-140, and on the first issue apply them to the evidence with respect to defendants’ conduct. This assignment is without merit for the simple reason that such evidence does not justify an inference of reckless driving. Furthermore, the complaint does not allege facts which, if proven, would constitute reckless driving on the part of the defendants; the allegation of reckless driving is largely a conclusion of the pleader stated in almost the exact words of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Garland v. PenegarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Brannon v. . SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Lookabill v. ReganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Carolina Scenic Stages v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Ingle v. Roy Stone Transfer CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. King v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API