Legal Opinion

Carolina Scenic Stages v. Lowther

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1951No. 524PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stact, O. J.

On sharply conflicting evidence, the jury has found both drivers responsible for the collision in suit. Hence, they never reached the issue of damages, either for the plaintiff or for the defendant on his counterclaim. Neither was allowed to recover and the plaintiff was taxed with the costs.

The evidentiary exceptions are not of sufficient moment to require any discussion or elaboration. They are too attenuate to have affected the outcome of the trial. It would be a work of supererogation and repetition to discuss them seriatim. Indeed, they seem to have been abandoned as they are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. McKinnon v. . Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Wright v. D. Pender Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Absher v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Owens v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Taney v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Bumgardner v. AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Godwin v. Johnson Cotton Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API