Brannon v. . Sprinkle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentConnor, J.
There were consolidated for the purpose of trial two cases, the plaintiff in each being the same person, the mother and the administratrix of her infant child, the intestate in the respective cases being Edward Brannon, aged four years, and Tommy Brannon, aged seven years, and the defendants in each case being the same.
Upon the plaintiff resting her case, the defendants moved the court to dismiss the action and for a judgment as of nonsuit, and upon denial thereof noted objection and reserved exception, and upon the close of all the evidence the defendants renewed their motion theretofore…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Watkins v. HellingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Fitch v. Selwyn Village, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Hedgepath v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Barlow v. . GurneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.