Legal Opinion

King v. Sloan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1964No. 249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The pleadings in this case are somewhat unusual in that they are concise, precise, and contain allegations of ultimate facts — not evidence and not conclusions. They conform to the requirement that a complaint should contain “A plain and concise statement of the facts constituting a cause of action, without unnecessary repetition.” G.S. 1-122 (2). “A party to an action is entitled as a matter of right to put into his pleading a concise statement of the facts constituting his cause of action or defense, and nothing more.” Patterson v. R. R., 214 N.C. 38, 198 S.E. 364. Doubtful it is, whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Fleming v. DryeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Harris v. ParrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Banks v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API