Legal Opinion

Garland v. Penegar

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1952No. 525PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviw, C. J.

It is apparent from, an examination of the record that the plaintiff offered sufficient evidence to carry the case to the jury on the issue of actionable fraud and deceit, and that defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly denied. Whitehurst v. Ins. Co., 149 N.C. 273, 62 S.E. 1067; Ward v. Heath, 222 N.C. 470, 24 S.E. 2d 5; Gray v. Edmonds, 232 N.C. 681, 62 S.E. 2d 77.

The defendant assigns error in the court’s charge to the jury, particularly on the issue of damages. It is urged that the court failed properly to instruct the jury as to the measure of damages and failed to apply…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. May v. . LoomisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Keith v. WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Goode v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API