Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Holman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1968No. 355PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHusKiNS, J.

The sole question presented for decision is whether or not the Court of Appeals erred in allowing Townsend’s motion for nonsuit.

On motion to nonsuit, all the evidence which tends to support plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and considered in its light most favorable to plaintiff, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which may legitimately be drawn therefrom. Homes, Inc. v. Bryson, 273 N.C. 84, 159 S.E. 2d 329; Insurance Co. v. Storage Co., 267 N.C. 679, 149 S.E. 2d 27. Contradictions and discrepancies are resolved in plaintiff’s favor. Walt v. Crews, 261 N.C. 143, 134…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hart v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Cassell v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Gaskill v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. McNair v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API