Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bagdazurian v. Nathanson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

These actions of tort, one for personal injury and the other for property damage, arise out of a collision between motor vehicles at an intersection of two streets. It would serve no useful purpose to narrate the evidence. The principles of law governing the rights of parties in such circumstances are well settled and need not be repeated. Ordinarily in a collision of this nature the due care of the plaintiff and the negligence of the defendant are questions for the jury. Hamel v. Sweatt, 256 Mass. 581. McMillin v. Cantrall, 257 Mass. 103. Bogert v. Corcoran, 260 Mass. 206, 209.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fournier v. ZinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Bogert v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Payson v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Hamel v. SweattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Stickel v. CassasaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Keyes v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Dodge v. Town Taxi, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Sims v. Town of FranklinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API