Legal Opinion

Thibeault v. Poole

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These two actions of tort, one by the wife and the other by her husband, arise out of a collision between an automobile owned by the husband and driven by the wife and an automobile driven by the defendant. The wife seeks to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by her. The husband seeks to recover damages sustained by him, as alleged in count 1 of his declaration, for injury to his automobile, and in count 2 for medical and hospital expenses incurred by him on account of his.wife in consequence of her injuries.

The collision occurred in West Brookfield on the Boston Post Road…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API