Legal Opinion

Stickel v. Cassasa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The original plaintiffs, husband and wife, were injured by a collision between a truck with trailer owned by the defendant, driven by his servant in the course of his employment, and an automobile sedan, driven by the wife, in which they were riding.

The question for determination is whether there was error in denying the defendant’s motion that verdicts in his favor be directed.

The trial judge could not properly direct verdicts for the defendant unless evidence binding upon the plaintiffs, as matter of law, required a finding either that the driver of the truck was not negligent, or that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Fournier v. ZinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Walker v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. AshlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Keyes v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Bagdazurian v. NathansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Collier v. Cahill Motor Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Marcelli v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API