Fournier v. Zinn
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries and property damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of a collision of an automobile, owned and operated by the defendant, and an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff. The jury viewed the scene of the accident. There was evidence of the defendant’s negligence. He moved for a directed verdict. In the Superior Court there was a verdict for the plaintiff.
A physician called by the plaintiff was allowed, subject to the defendant’s exception, to state his opinion of the probable duration of the plaintiff’s life. He said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Primock v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Daniell v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Salisbury v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Rooney v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Friedman v. Hendler Creamery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.