Legal Opinion
Bresnick v. Heath
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 31, 1935PublishedCited by 313 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for damage to the automobile of the plaintiff alleged to have been caused by the negligence or concurring negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that on a July morning he permitted his son, twenty-one years of age and a licensed operator, to take his automobile; that in it the son in company with two others was travelling along the Andover Road, so called, in Reading; that Franklin Street intersected and crossed Andover Road at right angles; that the paved portion of Andover Road was approximately forty…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by313 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.