Hamel v. Sweatt
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The plaintiff was injured, because of the collision of the bicycle she was riding with the defendant’s automobile, at the corner of Oak Street and Lillian Street, in Springfield. She testified that she was “thirteen and one half years old” at the time of the accident; that “she was not going very fast and rode in the direction of Oak street”; that as she approached this street she looked on both sides and saw the defendant’s automobile; that “She started to cross over Oak Street,” and thought she .could; that she looked again and “turned in to the left as quick as she could, because she was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Hayes v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Salisbury v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Fitzpatrick v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Daris v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Keyes v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Logan v. GowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bagdazurian v. NathansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Kentel v. LaidlawMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1939