Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1986No. Docket 86608PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. W. Simon, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claim was barred by the expiration of the applicable period of limitation. We affirm.

On November 5, 1981, Alexander Thomas (hereafter plaintiff) was employed by Michigan Chrome and Chemical Corporation, mixing chemicals manufactured by Pittsburgh Paint and Glass Company *82(and supplied by Allied-Kelite Products Division, Richardson Chemical Company, a division of Richardson Company), E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (and supplied…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bonney v. the Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Leary v. RuppMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Brown v. Drake-Willock International, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API