Legal Opinion

Bonney v. the Upjohn Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1983No. Docket 60821PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a circuit court order granting defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5).

According to the complaint, in July, 1971, plaintiff Wallace Bonney was afflicted with a condition of bone deterioration associated with certain dental treatments. To alleviate the condition, he was advised to take a drug called Lincocin manufactured by defendant. After taking considerable quantities of Lincocin, Mr. Bonney developed a variety of psychological and physical disorders which were eventually "crippling and disabling to his person”. Mr. Bonney underwent a series of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Locke v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Lemmerman v. FealkMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Detroit Board of Education v. Celotex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API