Legal Opinion

Lothian v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1982No. 64875, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether plaintiff’s claim for accrued retirement benefits, filed long after the applicable statutory period of limitations had expired, is barred. We hold that plaintiff’s claim is barred. Accordingly, we reverse.

I

In 1962, plaintiff Robert Lothian,1 a veteran member of the Detroit police force, decided to retire. Shortly before his retirement, plaintiff was offered the appointive civilian position of Second Deputy Police Commissioner. Plaintiff accepted the offer. On August 7, 1962, he communicated with the city’s Policemen and Firemen Retirement System to…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API