Legal Opinion

Browder v. International Fidelity Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1982No. 65520, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This dramshop case raises one principal question: may an injured party sue the surety on a bar’s liquor bond in contract and enjoy the six-year statute of limitations available to contract actions, or is the injured party limited to the dramshop act’s 1 tort action and its two-year period of limitations? There is a subsidiary question whether the plaintiff, having brought the dramshop tort action within two years against the bar and the unknown bar employee and obtained judgment, may, after the expiration of the two years amend her complaint to add a count in contract against the bond’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API