Legal Opinion

Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1992No. Docket Nos. 90914, 90915, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

Plaintiffs, injured in a one-car accident in Gratiot County, Michigan, filed separate product liability actions against defendant Ford Motor Company in Wayne Circuit Court. Because plaintiffs were injured there, defendant contends that venue is proper only in Gratiot County. Plaintiffs appeal a Court of Appeals decision reversing the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for change of venue. 187 Mich App 63; 466 NW2d 346 (1991). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

This is a products liability case involving a 1982 Ford Escort in which plaintiffs were injured in a one-car…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Town & Country Dodge, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gross v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Coleman v. GurwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Murdock v. HigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Brown v. Manistee County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API