Legal Opinion

Mascarenas v. Union Carbide Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1992No. Docket 127273PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the lower court’s grant of summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (10) in this products liability case. We affirm.

Bernardo Mascarenas (plaintiff) was employed by the Pennwalt Corporation as a mason tender and bricklayer from 1970 to 1985. He used various solvents to clean brick, remove mortar, and perform other such tasks. Four of these products are significant to the present action: methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, toluene, and Dowclene. Defendants supplied all four products to Pennwalt in large containers, and the products were then dispensed to employees in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stark v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Nelson v. HoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Duran v. Detroit News, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  5. Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API