Legal Opinion

People v. Montoya

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2001No. E027229PublishedCited by 26 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s finding that he is a mentally disordered offender (MDO).

I

Facts and Procedural History

On January 3, 1992, defendant pled guilty to one count of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211 1 ), admitted the personal use of a firearm within the meaning of section 12022.5, and was sentenced to an aggregate term of seven years in state prison. On February 26, 1999, the district attorney filed a petition for extended involuntary treatment pursuant to section 2970. The petition alleged (1) that defendant had been committed to the Department of Mental…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. VeraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. DunleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. CosgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API