People v. Saunders
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
Numerous California penal statutes allow increased punishment to be imposed upon a defendant if the prosecution alleges and proves that the defendant has suffered one or more prior convictions. In People v. Bracamonte (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 644, 654 [174 Cal.Rptr. 191], the Court of Appeal held that the defendant is entitled to have the determination of the truth of such allegations bifurcated from the jury trial of the currently charged offenses.
In the present case, we consider whether further proceedings to determine the truth of alleged prior convictions are barred if,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.