Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 2008No. B194403PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

In Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529 [53 Cal.Rptr.3d 856,150 P.3d 738] (Ben C.), our Supreme Court held that the judicial review procedures established in Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396], and People v. Wende (1979)25 Cal.3d 436 [158 Cal.Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071], do not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. P. v. Bracy CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. P. v. Gonzalez CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. P. v. Hickson CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. P. v. Payne CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API