Legal Opinion

People v. Beeson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2002No. E029397PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

Donald Lynn Beeson (defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the People’s petition for defendant’s continued involuntary treatment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO). Defendant claims that the court erred in ordering defendant’s continued confinement because insufficient evidence supported one of the criteria set forth in the MDO law, 1 namely, that defendant’s mental disorder could not be kept in remission without treatment. Defendant further claims that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that it should presume that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. CosgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. FulcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. San Joaquin County Public Conservator v. Joel E.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. People v. RowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API