People v. Wims
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this case we decide what standard a reviewing court must apply when deciding whether a trial judge’s failure to instruct the jury as to the factual elements necessary to support a sentence enhancement for use of a deadly and dangerous weapon, under Penal Code section 12022, subdivision (b),1 is prejudicial. Section 12022(b) imposes an additional term of one year upon “[a]ny person who personally uses a deadly or dangerous weapon in the commission or attempted commission of a felony.”2 We conclude that failure to instruct the jury as to all of the elements of section…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.