Hicks v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The petitioner was brought to trial in an Oklahoma court on a charge of unlawfully distributing heroin. Since he had been convicted of felony offenses twice within the preceding 10 years, the members of the jury were instructed, in accordance with the habitual offender statute then in effect in Oklahoma,1 *345that, if they found the petitioner guilty, they “shall assess [the] punishment at forty (40) years imprisonment.” The jury returned a verdict of guilt and imposed the mandatory 40-year prison term.
Subsequent to the petitioner’s conviction, the provision of the habitual offender statute under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by577 opinions
- Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Marsh v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
572 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.