Legal Opinion

Prather v. Abbot Laboratories

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-00573-HPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge.

This is a products liability and negligence case in which Plaintiff, Kris Prather, alleges that a medical device, the Pain Control Infusion Pump (“PCIP”), manufactured by Defendant, B. Braun Medical, Inc., caused severe and permanent damage to her shoulder.1 The PCIP is a medical device prescribed to alleviate the pain of a post-operative patient by delivering a continuous infusion of a local anesthetic into the post-operative site. Prather alleges several tort claims related to the PCIP after she developed chondrolysis in her…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Dealers Transport Co. v. Battery Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Red Hed Oil, Inc. v. H.T. Hackney Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
  2. Bosch v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  3. Waltenburg v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  4. Sims v. Atrium Med. Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
  5. Jackson v. E-Z-Go Div. of Textron, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API