Legal Opinion
Block v. Woo Young Medical Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 28, 2013No. Civil No. 09-1332 (JRT/JJK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary J. Block brings this action against Woo Young Medical Co. Ltd. (“Woo Young”), alleging that a Woo Young pain pump that wás inserted into the. intraarticular space of her shoulder joint following surgery caused serious cartilage damage. Block brings a negligence claim against Woo Young under North Carolina law. Woo Young has moved for summary judgment and to exclude four of Block’s experts. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny Woo Young’s motions.
BACKGROUND
I. SURGERY AND ITS ALLEGED RESULTS
On June 20,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
- Booker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. (In re Bard IVC Filters Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Bayes v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Jenkins v. North County General SurgeryDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022