Carol Mack v. Stryker Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Carol Mack underwent shoulder surgery in 2002. The surgeon inserted a pain pump designed to infuse anesthetic into Mack’s shoulder to mitigate her pain while she recovered from surgery. Following surgery, Mack developed a painful shoulder condition known as chondrolysis. Mack, along with her husband, sued Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation (collectively, “Stryker”), the manufacturer and seller of the pain pump. Mack alleged negligence and strict products liability for design defect and failure to warn. Her husband asserted a claim for loss of consortium.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Spencer v. Jackson County MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Paulos v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Gaudreault v. Elite Line Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Timothy Farkas v. Addition Mfg. TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- DeShane v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- Guilford v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020