Legal Opinion
Johansen v. Production Credit Ass'n of Marshall-Ivanhoe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1985No. C4-85-683PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants, a Lincoln County couple engaged in farming, brought a pro se federal suit against respondent, their farm lender, asserting numerous federal statutory violations. These claims were dismissed in a summary judgment against appellants. Appellants then found legal counsel and brought suit in state court, asserting common law causes of action. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, finding the causes of action asserted were res judicata and that there remained no genuine issues of material fact. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellants have farmed in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hoag v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Corum v. Farm Credit ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Production Credit Ass'n of Worthington v. Van IperenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ObermollerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. MacHughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.