Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 6, 1988No. C4-88-505PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting the respondent bank’s motion for summary judgment in its unlawful detainer action. The appellant property owners contend summary judgment proceedings do not apply in unlawful detainer actions and assert there are genuine issues of fact and valid defenses which preclude summary judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants Larry and Connie Obermoller borrowed $399,000 from the respondent Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul (Bank). As security for the loans, the Obermollers executed two mortgages on farmland they owned. The Obermollers…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McElwain v. Van BeekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Estate of Riedel Ex Rel. Mirick v. Life Care Retirement Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Brown v. Grant Holding, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API