Legal Opinion

Hoag v. New Jersey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1958No. 40PublishedCited by 314 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

In this case we are asked to set aside, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a state conviction secured under somewhat unusual circumstances.

On June 26, 1951, a Bergen County, New Jersey, grand jury returned three indictments against the petitioner charging that on September 20, 1950, in concert with two others, he robbed three individuals, Cascio, Capezzuto and Galiardo, at Gay’s Tavern in Fairview, New Jersey. These indictments were joined for trial. The State called five witnesses: the three victims named in the indictment, and two other persons, Dottino and Yager.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by314 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API