Legal Opinion

State v. Hooper

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2004No. 401A03PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The primary issue presented by the instant case is whether a defendant, whose probation has been revoked by order of the district court, should properly appeal his probation revocation to the superior court division or to the Court of Appeals. We hold that when the district court revokes a defendant’s probation, that defendant’s appeal is to the superior court; therefore, we vacate the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals to the contrary.

In 1996, the General Assembly enacted N.C.G.S. § 7A-272(c), which grants the district court jurisdiction to accept pleas of guilty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. LangleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Carter-Hubbard Publishing Co. v. WRMC Hospital Operating Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Knight Publishing Co. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Haarhuis v. CheekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API