State v. Pinch
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant brings forward many assignments of error which he contends require a new trial of these crimes, or a new sentencing hearing, or both. We disagree and affirm the sentences of death imposed upon the jury’s recommendations.
At the outset, we must note that defendant’s appellate counsel filed a brief which is 109 pages long.1 A defendant who stands convicted in a capital case is, of course, entitled to effective and diligent advocacy in the presentation of his appeal. However, defendant’s brief seems unduly lengthy and quite repetitious. Common sense dictates that there…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.