Legal Opinion

Haarhuis v. Cheek

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 2018No. COA17-1179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZACHARY, Judge.

*847*359Plaintiff Joris Haarhuis, as administrator of the estate of Julie Haarhuis, appeals from the trial court's order denying his Motion for Appointment of Receiver over defendant's unliquidated legal claims against third-parties. We reverse.

Background

Defendant Emily Cheek was driving while impaired in July 2013 when she hit and killed pedestrian Julie Haarhuis. Ms. Haarhuis's husband, Joris Haarhuis, qualified as administrator of his wife's estate.

At the time of the crash, Universal Insurance Company insured defendant's vehicle. Universal determined that the value of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. First of Georgia InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Investors Title Insurance v. HerzigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Coates Bros. v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)North Carolina Business Court · 2019
  2. Raymond Tarlton, as guardian ad litem for Henry Lee McCollum, et al. v. Leroy Allen, et al.; Jefferson Insurance Company, et al.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026
  3. Southland Nat'l Ins. Corp. v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  4. Stahl v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. Stahl v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API