Legal Opinion

Burt v. Scarborough

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1961No. L. A. 26445PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Athalie Irvine Burt, a director of the Irvine Company, brought this action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County for a writ of mandate against the company and its six other directors to compel them to allow her “accompanied by counsel of her choice” to attend meetings of the company’s board of directors. Four of the directors— Scarborough, McFadden, Honer and Wheeler—moved for a change of venue to Orange County, upon the ground that none of them resided in Los Angeles County but each was a resident of Orange County, and “the hearing, determination and trial of this action” should…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hanson v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Johnston v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fullerton v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Whittell v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API