Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1955No. S. F. 19054PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

— Defendant appeals from certain portions of the interlocutory decree of divorce and related orders. He challenges the propriety of the trial court’s assumption of in personam, jurisdiction over him by virtue of the service of process on him without the state. His objections cannot prevail in view of the provisions of the governing statutes. (Code Civ. Proc., §§412, 413, 417.)

Section 417 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: “Where jurisdiction is acquired over a person who is outside of this State by publication of summons in accordance with Sections 412 and 413, the court shall have the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Owens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Walters v. WeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Mizner v. MiznerNevada Supreme Court · 1968

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API