Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. State Water Resources Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1979No. Civ. 44501PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J .

This is an appeal by the State Department of Fish and Game 1 (Department) from a judgment denying its petition for a writ of mandate to compel the State Water Resources Control Board (Board) 2 to issue a permit for the “in-stream” appropriation of water to provide minimum flow guarantees during low months to protect the state’s beneficial interest in the fish resources of the Mattole River. The questions are whether: 1) physical control over the water is required for an “appropriation” of water; and 2) if not, whether the applicable constitutional and statutory provisions…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API