Hanson v. Graham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County refusing to dissolve an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment. The attachment was issued upon an affidavit that the defendant was a non-resident, and the motion to dissolve was upon the ground that the affidavit was not true, and that the defendant was a resident.
The affidavits read upon the hearing consist in great part of mere conclusions and statements on information and belief. The following facts, however, appear to be undisputed. The defendant, Graham, was a contractor for the building of railroads and other similar works. In 1884 he left his former residence, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Morgan v. NunesMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
- Krone v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Swaney v. HutchinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- Burrill v. JewettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864
3Cited by36 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. LentzUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Union National Bank v. FinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.