Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Kipp
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1949No. Civ. 3960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title to Lots 10 and 11 in Block 13 of Valencia Park, Unit No. 2. The plaintiffs claim under tax deeds to and from the state, and the defendants claim to be successors to an intervening interest, thus becoming the record owners.
The complaint, filed February 2,1948, alleges that the plaintiffs are the owners in fee and entitled to possession of the property. The answer, in addition to a general denial, alleges that the defendants are the owners in fee, in possession and entitled to possession.
The evidence discloses that these lots were sold to the state on June 29,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Linforth v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Union Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. ThorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- McCaslin v. HamblenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Riverhouse Publishing Company v. PorterDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976