Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. McCloskey

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1894No. 18219PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, J.—

Plaintiff brought this action for a decree reviving a certain mortgage, and subrogating him to the rights of the assignee of said mortgage. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, which includes findings, their general contention being that upon the findings the judgment should have been for defendants.

The facts are, briefly, these: The plaintiff, Shaffer, and the defendant, McOloskey, were, on February 11, 1888, the owners, as tenants in common, by purchase from one Fahey, of certain land described in the complaint; and on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Swift v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Barnes v. CamackNew York Supreme Court · 1847

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API