Shaffer v. McCloskey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
McFarland, J.—
Plaintiff brought this action for a decree reviving a certain mortgage, and subrogating him to the rights of the assignee of said mortgage. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, which includes findings, their general contention being that upon the findings the judgment should have been for defendants.
The facts are, briefly, these: The plaintiff, Shaffer, and the defendant, McOloskey, were, on February 11, 1888, the owners, as tenants in common, by purchase from one Fahey, of certain land described in the complaint; and on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Swift v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Barnes v. CamackNew York Supreme Court · 1847
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.