Legal Opinion

Linforth v. Montgomery

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1924No. Docket No. S.F. 10632PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in an action to quiet his title to certain real estate and to enjoin a sale thereof under a certain writ of execution which the plaintiff asserted to be void. Many of the facts which- exist as a background to the present litigation have been set forth by this court in its decision in the case of Montgomery v. Meyerstein et al., 186 Cal. 459 [199 Pac. 800], and in a later phase of the same case, this day decided (Montgomery v. Meyerstein et al., ante, p. 37 [231 Pac. 730]). The additional facts upon which the plaintiff herein predicates…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Montgomery v. MeyersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Webb v. MeloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ames v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Montgomery v. MeyersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. National Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Jensen v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Progressive Collection Bureau v. WhealtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API