Linforth v. Montgomery
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor in an action to quiet his title to certain real estate and to enjoin a sale thereof under a certain writ of execution which the plaintiff asserted to be void. Many of the facts which- exist as a background to the present litigation have been set forth by this court in its decision in the case of Montgomery v. Meyerstein et al., 186 Cal. 459 [199 Pac. 800], and in a later phase of the same case, this day decided (Montgomery v. Meyerstein et al., ante, p. 37 [231 Pac. 730]). The additional facts upon which the plaintiff herein predicates…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Montgomery v. MeyersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Webb v. MeloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Ames v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Montgomery v. MeyersteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
- National Enterprises, Inc. v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Jensen v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Progressive Collection Bureau v. WhealtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.