Legal Opinion
Union Bank v. Wendland
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1976No. Civ. 33621PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff (hereinafter “Union Bank”) in an action upon a promissory note. The issues presented are whether the trial court erred in finding that said promissory note was not intended by the parties to be secured by a first deed of trust executed by defendant; whether the cause of action to recover upon said note was barred by the antideficiency provisions of section 580d;1 whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for leave to amend his answer to conform to proof; and whether plaintiff’s interest under a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Brady v. Elixir IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Commonwealth Mortgage Assurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- City of Stanton v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- First Security Bank of Utah v. ShiewUtah Supreme Court · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.