Legal Opinion

McCaslin v. Hamblen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1951No. L. A. 21239; L. A. 21240PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

These actions were brought to quiet the plaintiffs’ title to contiguous unimproved parcels each containing five acres of land in the city of Arcadia. The defendants Hamblen claimed both parcels pursuant to tax deeds from the city. The plaintiffs appealed from adverse judgments determining the validity of the tax deed titles. The actions were consolidated for trial and a single record is presented on appeal.

The causes were submitted to the trial court on a stipulation of facts. The city of Arcadia is a city of the sixth class and levies and collects its own taxes. In 1931 Anita M. Baldwin was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rand v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Davault v. EssigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elbert, Ltd. v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Helvey v. SaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sears v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sheeter v. LifurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Mayer v. L&B REAL ESTATECalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API