Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Bryson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 2012No. 10 Civ. 3105(FM)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs in this putative class action (“Plaintiffs”) allege that the process by which the United States Census Bureau (“Census Bureau”) screens applicants for temporary jobs for the decennial census is racially discriminatory and therefore violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”). Specifically, the Plaintiffs challenge (1) the Census Bureau’s policy requiring all applicants with criminal records to provide “official court documentation” of their prior arrests and convictions…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Agerbrink v. Model Service LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Soroof Trading Development Co. v. Ge Microgen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), Ltd. v. Coventry First LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Kutluca v. PQ New York Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Houser v. PritzkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.