Legal Opinion

Soroof Trading Development Co. v. Ge Microgen, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 11, 2012No. 10 Civ. 1391 (LTS) (JCF)PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is an action for breach of contract and misrepresentation against defendants GE Microgen, Inc. (“GE Microgen”) and Plug Power, Inc. (“Plug Power”), who were the members of the now-defunct GE Fuel Cell Systems, LLC (“GEFCS”). Plaintiff Soroof Trading Development Company Ltd. (“So-roof’) seeks leave to amend its complaint to add the General Electric Company (“GE”) as a defendant. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.

Background

The following facts are taken from the proposed second amended complaint. GEFCS…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Mark B. Pangburn v. James Culbertson, Court Clerk John M. York, Sheriff, & Sheriff's Property ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York v. Phase Construction Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. City of Almaty v. AblyazovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Mazuma Holding Corp. v. BethkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. McBeth v. PorgesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. Harrison v. Soroof Int'l, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API