Legal Opinion

MacCallum-Donahoe Finance Co. v. Warren

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922No. 17425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

-On February 21, 1920, appellant delivered to Harry Howell, doing business as Savage Sales Company, a Columbia Six automobile, which he agreed to purchase under the terms of a conditional sales contract, executed by the parties at the time. The purchase price was $1,795.45, payable on demand. The conditional sales contract was filed for record in the office of the county auditor of Lewis county, where the vendee, Howell, resided and conducted his business, on February 26, 1920, thus being well within the ten-day period required by the statute. Sections *1773790 and 3791, Rem. Comp; Stat.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. KratzWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Worley v. Metropolitan Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re LowryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. C. I. T. Corp. v. MachenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. C.I.T. Corporation v. NaudackArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Diamond Iron Works v. WerleyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. MacCallum-donahoe Finance Co. v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API