Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. Martin
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Neterer, J., entered September 13, 1905, dismissing an action of replevin, upon granting a motion for a nonsuit at the end of plaintiff’s case.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
On December 23, 1903, the plaintiff, Wittler-Corbin Machinery Company, a corporation of Seattle, Washington, made to one Earl B. Nims a conditional sale of one 30-horse power, stationary, side-crank, slide-valve engine, manufactured by L. L. Graves, of Streetor, Illinois. A written memorandum of the sale stating its terms and conditions, signed by the vendor and vendee, was, on December 31, 1903, filed in the office of the auditor of Whatcom county, the same being the county in which the vendee resided. This contract stipulated, that the purchase money should be paid by Nims in installments;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilhoit v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Payson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Crumrine v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Diemer v. GuernseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Morris v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Malmo v. Washington Rendering & Fertilizing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Worley v. Metropolitan Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.